Would it be possible for the Viking age to continue until the 19th century?

Would it be possible for Scandinavia to be a base of widespread raiding in Europe until the 19th century? The Barbary pirates managed to raid and attack European targets until the early 19th century. Would this require a Northern equivalent of the Ottomans as a source of external support? I assume that Christianity doesn't take hold with some type of reformed native religion taking its place or a heretical branch doesn't have an issue raiding and enslaving Christians. I'm not too familiar with the economic cost or resources required for defense against the Barbary pirates.
 
Last edited:
Would this require a Northern equivalent of the Ottomans as a source of external support?
Yes. Likely it would require a giant pagan Russia/Russia equivalent to the east. The Scandinavian market is too small for slave trading to be much of a thing and they'd have no ability to establish manpower-intensive industries in other colonies.
 
A technologically stagnant Europe with no gunpowder would be a necessity. The main method of defence against the Barbary Corsairs was to bombard the North African ports that sponsored them.
 
I've often pondered such a scenario. One convoluted and vague timeline would involve a pre-Viking Age POD wherein Christianity fails to fully take hold in Anglo-Saxon England.

The idea is that if we assume the Norse desire for wealth and living space was the result of pressures that will exist no matter the timeline, then they will still raid Northern Europe. Let's then assume that the conquest of England still goes ahead, but this time England is home to a substantial pagan population. Though Anglo-Saxon pagaism was not identical to Norse paganism, from what little we know the two were similar, and in any case pagan religions didn't tend to be overly discriminatory to other pagan religions.

This gives the Norse ruling class a stronger base and less pressure to Christianise. If they successfully subsume England, given enough time that creates a powerful pseudo-Scandinavia state primed to retain a culture of seafaring. As naval technology progresses (they might even lead the charge on that front) the Anglo-Norse can raid farther. We might very well see earlier permanent settlements in North America that aren't doomed to fail.

So what next? Let's say the Reconquista still occurs in Iberia. Religious fervour is high in Europe and the pagan north is feeling isolated. Raiding for resources and wealth resumes. We get a blend of a Second Viking Age and a Golden Age of Piracy. If we also assume some Christian power still makes first contact with Mexico, the Caribbean, the Inca, and so on, we could see pagan pseudo-Vikings/privateers raiding the Atlantic out of secret bases in the Caribbean, Africa, and North America.

As I said, convoluted, but fun to imagine.
 
The vikings were not people but rather role that wealth well off Scandinavians did often ether trading or raiding or both this was most common before the Scandinavian kingdom's had been created.

Europe also become more fortified and vigilant with dealing with such threats and thus it is why it came out of fashion
 
The vikings were not people but rather role that wealth well off Scandinavians did often ether trading or raiding or both this was most common before the Scandinavian kingdom's had been created.
That's not really relevant to the OP. The span of time between the 793 and 1066 is widely referred to as the Viking Age, beginning with the raid on Lindisfarne and ending with the defeat of Harald King Hardrada of Norway at the Battle of Stamford Bridge. This is regardless of what the word 'vikingr' actually meant. In any case using the term "Viking" to refer to those Scandinavians who sailed out of the fjords and Baltic to raid, pillage, and pirate the European coastlines and rivers has been common practice for centuries. Let's not get hung up on pedantry.

In any event I think a prolonged Danelaw over England would have facilitated a prolonged Viking Age, even if the Norse did convert to Christianity. England simply becomes a stronger base of operations. The Danelaw itself was loosely confederated and decentralised so it's unlikely it can wholly survive without coalescing around a single king or reforming in some meaningful way, but extending its life, either by having the Norse and Danes succeed in conquering Wessex (entirely possible if Alfred had fled to Francia) or consolidating their existing gains, would certainly extend the notion that they can raid and conquer with impunity.
 
Would it be possible for Scandinavia to be a base of widespread raiding in Europe until the 19th century? The Barbary pirates managed to raid and attack European targets until the early 19th century. Would this require a Northern equivalent of the Ottomans as a source of external support? I assume that Christianity doesn't take hold with some type of reformed native religion taking its place or a heretical branch doesn't have an issue raiding and enslaving Christians. I'm not too familiar with the economic cost or resources required for defense against the Barbary pirates.

Not really. Once the feudal realms of western Europe united and got their act together, the easy targets dried up and the viking age ended. The viking age continuing would require western Europe to remain a mess of independent small feudal states all unable to resist larger viking raids or financing punitive expeditions to the lands whence the vikings came, which seems unlikely - if they do remain like that, other realms will conquer them and resist the vikings.
 
Not really. Once the feudal realms of western Europe united and got their act together, the easy targets dried up and the viking age ended. The viking age continuing would require western Europe to remain a mess of independent small feudal states all unable to resist larger viking raids or financing punitive expeditions to the lands whence the vikings came, which seems unlikely - if they do remain like that, other realms will conquer them and resist the vikings.
Denmark and the formerly Norse Scottish islands maybe, but one could imagine a pagan Sweden/Norway/Finland/Baltic remaining a continual threat to Christendom (and occasional trading partner of course) for quite some time just as the Barbary states did. The Barbary pirates did huge damage in the Mediterranean during their height despite facing opponents far more organised than any medieval.
 
Top