Fatboy Coxy
Monthly Donor
Hi naraht, that's a good question. In the main, its Singapore time, however, I've been quite bad at this in retrospect, as I'm sure some of my North African times are actually wrong (they maybe Singapore time and not of the appropriate time zone). And again some of the Churchill posts might also be askew. The Pearl Harbor event is defiantly set at Singapore time, but the post will note the Hawaii local time as well.Whose time? London, Singapore, tokyo, Washington?
It really make me wonder, is there *any* level of defense of Singapore/Malaya that would cause the Japanese to pull enough Army troops from the Philippines to make a significant difference (just as a guide having MacArthur evacuate/die more than a month later, or even survive without evacuating at all)
It's a problem for me because I will have posts that are happening within hours of each other, and I've tried to write everything chronologically. I guess I should have asked how others manage it in their timelines on the writers forum, back when I first started writing. I'll make sure you have a local time as well as the chronological time in future posts.
Regarding the second question, I don't think the Japanese can pull any troops from the Philippines, historically there were some units sent from the Malayan Campaign to the Philippines, but this had been planned pre operations. Perhaps there is a possibility of fixing the British force in Malaya (strategically), and pushing harder through Borneo, developing a central thrust with the two wings (Malaya and Philippines neutralised in stalemate), but the IJN would have the final say in that, not the Army, I think. I think we've got to see if the British can get to a position of holding the Japanese invasion of Malaya first, before we can play out that option, but it's a thought.
Re the MacArthur bit, he's not dying, if that's what your asking, I'll keep him as historical as possible, otherwise he might take over my whole 'what if'